After spending the week playing around with paper prototypes and cardboard models I recieved the following feedback:
Max Glanville
Suggested that my lid should punch the foil base once lifted off the container.
He also suggested that I add finger grooves to the circular lid for better grip.
Matthew Patane:
Suggested I add a flat side and a curved side so the consumer knows which way is up.
He also mentioned that my design needs to be price realistic and I should look to other materials.
Sarah Howard
Sunday, 11 August 2013
Monday, 5 August 2013
Week Two - 5th August
After showing my concepts to my tutor, I have been suggested to do the following:
1. Focus on single use packaging concepts
2. Focus on how the product is dispensed
3. Focus on how you hold the product
4. How the packaging can become a useful afterlife product or easy to clean
1. Focus on single use packaging concepts
2. Focus on how the product is dispensed
3. Focus on how you hold the product
4. How the packaging can become a useful afterlife product or easy to clean
Sunday, 27 May 2012
Sunday, 13 May 2012
Peer Comments
Max Glanville
http://maxglanvillez3333044.blogspot.com.au/2012/05/rationale-booklet-packaging-assignment.html?showComment=1336969824130
Edric Verbeek-Martin
http://edricides1122.blogspot.com.au/2012/05/project-2-society-packaging-and.html?showComment=1336970016207
Rowena Goodall
http://rowenagoodall.blogspot.com.au/2012/05/sparkler-packaging-rational-booklet.html
Matthew Patane
http://21612a3377299.blogspot.com.au/2012/05/project-2-final.html?showComment=1336972003786
Silas McIntyre
http://3377850assesment.blogspot.com.au/2012/05/packaging-project.html?showComment=1336982322706
http://maxglanvillez3333044.blogspot.com.au/2012/05/rationale-booklet-packaging-assignment.html?showComment=1336969824130
Edric Verbeek-Martin
http://edricides1122.blogspot.com.au/2012/05/project-2-society-packaging-and.html?showComment=1336970016207
Rowena Goodall
http://rowenagoodall.blogspot.com.au/2012/05/sparkler-packaging-rational-booklet.html
Matthew Patane
http://21612a3377299.blogspot.com.au/2012/05/project-2-final.html?showComment=1336972003786
Silas McIntyre
http://3377850assesment.blogspot.com.au/2012/05/packaging-project.html?showComment=1336982322706
Monday, 30 April 2012
Monday, 23 April 2012
Who Killed the Electric Car?
· California has the worst air quality in the
states
· This has debilitating effects of the human
population such as
-
Asthmas
-
Cancer
-
Lung leisure
· EV1 first modern electric car from a major
car production company
· Oil companies fought the electric car
movement
· The Californian state government passed
legislation that car companies must comply with reducing gas emissions or they
could not sell their cars in the state
· California adjusted the mandate
· Federal state decided to fund the research of
hydrogen technology
· In 2003 California killed its electric car
mandate
· EV1 were pulled off the road and crushed,
even though they were in perfect condition
· Tax payers money is not being spent to
prepare for the future
· Oil imports in 1977 – 8.8 million barrels per
day
· Oil imports in 2005 – 13.5 million barrels
per day
· Hydrogen fuel cell car:
-
Current fuel
cell car costs $1 million
-
Not enough
room for hydrogen fuel
-
Hydrogen is
expensive
-
Need
fuelling infrastructure
-
Competing
technologies must NOT improve
I learnt a lot from watching "Who killed the electric car". My original perception of the electric cars, that they weren't as good as fuel cars and had limited capacities, was exactly like the consumers of california. After watching this film, I would definitely prefer to be driving an electric car. I think it was horrible to the californian state government to go through building all the infrastructure for electric cars to then completely change their mind due to pressure from car companies. I disliked the fact that consumers couldn't keep these cars, they were in perfect condition and they were not hurting anyone. I believe they wanted to hide all evidence that there was a need for these cars. People couldn't be reminded of this if they couldn't see them on the road. My three take home messages are as follows:
1. Cars need to be designed with the environment in mind, we are damaging our environment and habitat if we ignore the need
2. There is so much new technology out there that can be used but no one wants to fight the oil companies because they have so much power
3. Politicians and other power authorities need to do their job properly.
I learnt a lot from watching "Who killed the electric car". My original perception of the electric cars, that they weren't as good as fuel cars and had limited capacities, was exactly like the consumers of california. After watching this film, I would definitely prefer to be driving an electric car. I think it was horrible to the californian state government to go through building all the infrastructure for electric cars to then completely change their mind due to pressure from car companies. I disliked the fact that consumers couldn't keep these cars, they were in perfect condition and they were not hurting anyone. I believe they wanted to hide all evidence that there was a need for these cars. People couldn't be reminded of this if they couldn't see them on the road. My three take home messages are as follows:
1. Cars need to be designed with the environment in mind, we are damaging our environment and habitat if we ignore the need
2. There is so much new technology out there that can be used but no one wants to fight the oil companies because they have so much power
3. Politicians and other power authorities need to do their job properly.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)